![The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical](http://www.neoventa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/table-11.jpg)
The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical
![Time to reconsider: Have the 2015 FIGO and 2017 Swedish intrapartum cardiotocogram classifications led us from Charybdis to Scylla? - Olofsson - 2021 - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica - Wiley Online Library Time to reconsider: Have the 2015 FIGO and 2017 Swedish intrapartum cardiotocogram classifications led us from Charybdis to Scylla? - Olofsson - 2021 - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica - Wiley Online Library](https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/cms/asset/a4038b32-ee3d-4a6c-9283-9fa9dbee71cb/aogs14201-fig-0001-m.jpg)
Time to reconsider: Have the 2015 FIGO and 2017 Swedish intrapartum cardiotocogram classifications led us from Charybdis to Scylla? - Olofsson - 2021 - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica - Wiley Online Library
![Swedish study investigates discrepancies between CTG classification systems, and the impact on ST event significance. « Neoventa Medical Swedish study investigates discrepancies between CTG classification systems, and the impact on ST event significance. « Neoventa Medical](http://www.neoventa.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/table-3.jpg)
Swedish study investigates discrepancies between CTG classification systems, and the impact on ST event significance. « Neoventa Medical
![Bigger is not always better… The validity of the US randomized trial of STAN for Norway « Neoventa Medical Bigger is not always better… The validity of the US randomized trial of STAN for Norway « Neoventa Medical](http://www.neoventa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/guidelines-no-fast-pa-eng.jpg)
Bigger is not always better… The validity of the US randomized trial of STAN for Norway « Neoventa Medical
![The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical](http://www.neoventa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/table-3.jpg)
The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical
![Twitter 上的Roberto Medina B:"FIGO 2015. Guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring. #ENARM #RCTG https://t.co/uxLGrr52zg" / Twitter Twitter 上的Roberto Medina B:"FIGO 2015. Guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring. #ENARM #RCTG https://t.co/uxLGrr52zg" / Twitter](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DzCKChdU8AAdWoY.jpg)
Twitter 上的Roberto Medina B:"FIGO 2015. Guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring. #ENARM #RCTG https://t.co/uxLGrr52zg" / Twitter
![Interobserver agreement and reliability in intrapartum cardiotocography interpretation, using the 2015 FIGO consensus guidelines | Semantic Scholar Interobserver agreement and reliability in intrapartum cardiotocography interpretation, using the 2015 FIGO consensus guidelines | Semantic Scholar](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/68d1d5c01b470191370cd1e5e94339b4d43b57b1/3-Table1-1.png)
Interobserver agreement and reliability in intrapartum cardiotocography interpretation, using the 2015 FIGO consensus guidelines | Semantic Scholar
![Introduction of the Physiological CTG Interpretation & Hypoxia in Labour (HIL) Tool, and its Incorporation into a Software Programme: Impact on Perinatal Outcome Introduction of the Physiological CTG Interpretation & Hypoxia in Labour (HIL) Tool, and its Incorporation into a Software Programme: Impact on Perinatal Outcome](https://juniperpublishers.com/gjorm/images/GJORM.MS.ID.555737.G003.png)
Introduction of the Physiological CTG Interpretation & Hypoxia in Labour (HIL) Tool, and its Incorporation into a Software Programme: Impact on Perinatal Outcome
![Swedish study investigates discrepancies between CTG classification systems, and the impact on ST event significance. « Neoventa Medical Swedish study investigates discrepancies between CTG classification systems, and the impact on ST event significance. « Neoventa Medical](http://www.neoventa.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/table-1.jpg)