![Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com](https://i1.wp.com/matt-jaskulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DSC_3851.jpg?fit=1200%2C903)
Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com
![Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com](https://i2.wp.com/matt-jaskulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DSC_3885.jpg)
Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com
![Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com](https://i0.wp.com/matt-jaskulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DSC_3874.jpg)
Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com
![Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com](http://matt-jaskulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DSC_0251.jpg)
Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com
![Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com](http://matt-jaskulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DSC_3856.jpg)